Referring to the News Gujarat HC upholds Lokayukta's appointment
@oongalbaaz Tweets : In short: A shoe on NaMo's face
Narendra Modi did not appoint Lokayukta for 7 years and BJP say it is supporting Jan Lokpal Bill.
There are so many irregularities. But Modi wants to shield himself and his ministers, so he is not appointing a Lok Ayukta for the past 7 years
Corruption has gone upto to the highest levels. Example,2G, Commonwealth Games, Yeddiurappa in land denotification,Votes for notes etc. If the Head of Govt starts appointing Lokayukta, Will it really help in fighting corruption? In case of Gujarat It is the Governor who has the power to appoint Lokayukta after consulting the CM. But, Governor has the ultimate power. Shameless BJP and Shameless CM is downsizing the HC.
After a marathon hearing, a division bench came up with a split verdict with justice Akil Kureshi concluding that the consultation process between the CM and the chief justice was over and the appointment was not illegal, particularly looking at the fact that the post was vacant for more than seven years. Justice Sonia Gokani in the bench had a dissenting view and quashed the appointment.
Chief Minister Narendra Modi & Gujarat Governor Kamla Beniwal
Chief Minister Narendra Modi & Gujarat Governor Kamla Beniwal
Following this disagreement, the case was referred to a third judge - justice V M Sahai, who heard the case on points of disagreement between the two judges. The points formulated by the division bench were - 1. Looking at the nature of consultation required for appointment of Lokayukta under Section 3 of the Gujarat Lokayukta Act, in the present case as a matter of fact, whether the consultative process between the Chief Justice and the Chief Minister had come to a close and there was a deadlock between the two dignitaries? 2. Whether the Governor of the State was authorized to act in a manner she did while issuing a notification appointing Justice R.A. Mehta as Lokayukta of the State without the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers? 3. What final order? In other words, should the petitions be allowed or should the petitions be dismissed. Further if the petitions are to be allowed, should further direction for appointment of a new Lokayukta within time frame be given to the State Government?
After hearing the case, justice Sahai agreed with justice Kureshi's view and held that the governor's decision was legal. With the third judge's opinion, the government's petition has been dismissed. However, the formal pronouncement may be made by the division bench, as the matter has been referred to the acting chief justice.
Modi Stonewalling Lokayukta appointment threatened rule of law,Chief Minister's pranks show deconstruction of democracy, said Justice Sahai. it's huge setback to Narendra Modi as Gujarat HC upholds Lokayukta's appointment.
Modi as he growing old, the level of frustuation is shooting within him,and looks like can play crooked and ever ready to do anything
If Modi had any morals, any conscience he would have resigned. But then Modi the Hindu god of death and destruction has full support of Hindu Extremists and Terrorists. What does he care for morality, conscience, criminal charges against him, charges of moral and financial corruption. He is immune to it, because he is the Hindu god-man.
I have always said in the past that Gujarat courts are not capable of delivering justice, now looks like i have some hope, but after saying that , in same breath i hope Gujarat HC decision will not act as the Support level in increasing the victory margin of Narendra modi in upcoming assembly election !
No comments:
Post a Comment