by jameel
More power to Justice Katju. More joy to Sunny Leone.
Justice Katju says that we shouldnt judge people by their past. True!! Sunny Leone now has a bright future in india.. :)
"Lord Buddha stayed with the courtesan Amrapali and ate food served by her, and she later became his disciple." Justice Katju on Sunny Leone http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2788186.ece In whichJustice Katju speaks about Mary Magdalene, Amrapali & Sunny Leone.
Justice Katju compares Sunny Leone to divine council. PerhapsJustice Katju had Nirvanic experience while watching her random videos. Confusing one may say He tells us to not judge people by their past. And judging is what he gets paid for.
I think Justice Katju had to watch Bigg Boss before he could tell us that Sunny Leone wasn't such a bad sort after all,So one thing is clear,Justice Katju watches Bigg Boss, but doesn't like news coverage about it.
Buddha & Amrapali
I agree with Justice Katju.We shouldn't judge ppl by their past profession. Many people are still alive today because actor akshaykumar isn't a chef, "there is no saint without a past and no sinner without a future"
Now every one can Forget cold...Sunny days are here ! thanks justice katju.. we indians have one more sensational issue to ponder on.
On serious note ;.....
Why does Justice Katju’s opinion on Sunny Leone matter at all? What appears on entertainment channels is outside the remit of the PCI, which is mandated only to oversee (print) news media.
Indeed, Justice Katju is stepping on the toes of the Broadcast Content Complaints Council (BCCC), the independent regulatory body that oversees all content on television other than content which has been certified by the Censor Board. It is for them to decide whether Sunny Leone should or should not appear on entertainment channels.
The BCCC received over 3,000 complaints against Sunny Leone’s appearance on Bigg Boss. “We did receive a complaint from BCCC regarding participation of Sunny Leone in Bigg Boss Season 5, and appeared before BCCC and clarified our position. BCCC agreed with our position that content on the show is in compliance with self-regulatory guidelines,” saidColors.
That’s the only certification that matters — the BCCC’s certification. Not Justice Katju’s. His opinion on the subject is ads material as that of a lay person. Going by his own views on news media, Justice Katju’s comments on Sunny Leone should not even have been covered by news media. Are his comments important? No. Is Sunny Leone a ‘real’ issue that is ‘basically socio-economic in nature’? No.
His comments are comments on entertainment, a vertical which receives far more coverage than Justice Katju believes that the vertical deserves. When the BCCC comments on Sunny Leone, its comments are not on entertainment, they are on the regulation of entertainment.
Justice Katju might have an opinion on many and all issues. Only when he comments on the press are his views newsworthy; coverage of his comments on anything else, is, by Justice Katju’s own standards, irresponsible at best.
Unless, of course, the coverage is in the entertainment pages.
No comments:
Post a Comment